| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart
''Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart'', 427 U.S. 539 (1976), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States decision in which the Court held unconstitutional prior restraints on media coverage during criminal trials.
==Background==
''Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart'' involved a debate over whether or not the press may be prevented from releasing through publication information which was seen to be "implicative of guilt" related to the defendant. The 1971 ruling in the Supreme Court case ''New York Times Co. v. United States'' formulated the principle that the concept of prior restraint is largely unconstitutional. The case also put forth the opinion that it is the duty of the government to satisfy an extreme explanation in order to satisfy usage of prior restraint against the press. Prior to the 1976 ruling by the Supreme Court, lower courts in the United States had initiated a practice of barring intense levels of reporting on certain issues in criminal matters; media coverage of such rulings referred to them as gag orders.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|